Record losses at Wolves

Wolverhampton Wanderers booked a £15.3 million ($20.2m) loss in their 2024-25 Premier League season, even as they reaped £117m in player-trading profits — by some distance a new club record. Wolves’ latest books also paint a picture of a club in decline on the pitch, very much setting the scene for their awful 2025-26 campaign.

Wolves extended their accounting period, moving their May year-end date to June, and in doing so were able to book the sales of Matheus Cunha and Rayan Ait-Nouri, to Manchester United and Manchester City respectively, into last season’s accounts.

Wolves’ revenue fell by £5.7m last season, driven by dropping from finishing 14th in the Premier League in 2023-24 to 16th and also having two fewer games selected for live broadcast (15, against the 17 a year earlier). Those factors reduced broadcast income by £8.4m, and that revenue stream is likely to decline further this term.

Like most Premier League clubs outside the ‘Big Six’, Wolves rely on TV money for a majority of their income, so waning on-field performance has a clear impact on finances.

Revenues from gate receipts at Molineux held about steady at £21.8m, with matchday income almost tripling since their most recent promotion at the end of the 2017-18 campaign. On available figures, their gate receipts were the Premier League’s 11th-highest last season, but a drop is expected in this area for the next one.

Player sales

Player sales have been an increasingly vital provider of funds for Wolves, with last season being their second in a row spending less than they recouped. They have generated £275.6m from such sales in the past two years, albeit after spending a record £211.6m on new players in 2022-23.

The Athletic understands Wolves have, however, spent slightly more than they’ve received in 2025-26, even after the winter-window sales of Strand Larsen, Agbadou and Jhon Arias. The size of that spend will increase if, as is expected, Ladislav Krejci’s loan move from Girona is made permanent before the end of June.

Wolves’ financial debt didn’t really budge, sitting at £101.4m to the end of last June. That remained the case even after a refinancing in September, whereby the club replaced an existing £100m bank loan with a new lender, PGIM, a U.S. asset management firm.

The refinancing sets a new repayment date of October 2031 and shifts the interest involved from variable to fixed rate. That rate rises half a percentage point to 7.85 per cent if Wolves go down, though that’s not too dissimilar to the amount they’ve been paying at variable rates.

Occupying the Premier League’s basement for so long has given them a greater opportunity to plan for life outside the top flight than most enjoy (in the least applicable sense of the word) and, like the majority of recently-relegated teams, a combination of parachute payments and player sales would surely be used to fund an immediate promotion push. Yet how much the club can manage from their own resources outside the Premier League will depend on those transfer exits and the amount of time they spend in the EFL.

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful. Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy). However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch. Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog