Skip to main content

Chelsea performed better under Abramovich

Chelsea's owners are rational actors so what is their strategy?

Under the ownership of free-spending oligarch Roman Abramovich Chelsea Football Club lost about £1mn a week for almost two decades. The losses racked up by the club’s current owners have made the Abramovich era appear restrained by comparison.

Chelsea this month reported a £262 mn pre-tax loss in 2024-25, a record for a Premier League club, as owners Clearlake Capital and financier Todd Boehly try to wean the club off Abramovich’s millions.

When US investment firm Clearlake and financier Boehly bought Chelsea for £2.5 bn almost three years ago, the football industry expected a new era of financial rigour at the west London club. But they have since spent about €1.7bn (£1.5bn) on players, parted ways with four head coaches and have yet to agree on a critical revenue driver: whether to modernise Chelsea’s existing stadium or move elsewhere. With the club at risk of missing out on a place in next season’s lucrative Champions League, football executives are questioning how Chelsea’s owners will make a return on their substantial investment.

Chelsea is the first team ever bought by Clearlake, which was better known for investing in the technology and consumer sectors. The Santa Monica-based firm owns more than 60 per cent of the club and its co-founder and managing partner, Behdad Eghbali, has emerged as a key decision maker.

Boehly, whose mentors include Guggenheim Partners chief Mark Walter and junk bond pioneer Michael Milken, has tasted success in sports. After backing Walter’s takeover of the Los Angeles Dodgers in 2012, the baseball team went on to win its first World Series title in 32 years. Their bet on Chelsea was predicated on the belief that elite European football clubs, which trade at a discount to US sports teams despite the sport’s greater global popularity, were undervalued.

Shortly after the deal, Clearlake co-founder José E Feliciano talked up the opportunity to grow Chelsea’s revenue to £1bn. Chelsea’s owners, who withheld £150mn of the purchase price to cover costs related to questionable actions taken under Abramovich, have put in place new private equity-style financing. At the centre of this is a $500mn payment-in-kind note provided by Ares Management to Chelsea’s holding company, 22 Holdco.

The club’s owners have spent €1.75 bn signing talented young players in the hope that they have greater resale value, which should enable them to eventually reduce their reliance on external financing. Chelsea have partly offset the spending splurge with €921mn of player sales.

While Abramovich’s reign was often chaotic, Chelsea won 17 major trophies, including five Premier League titles and two Champions League trophies, in that time. The only silverware of the Clearlake era so far is the Club World Cup and the European third-tier Uefa Conference League.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do

Fulham cost the owner £1.4m a week

Things have changed a lot at Craven Cottage since Tommy Cooper was chairman.  Fulham are arguably London’s poshest club.  As their chief executive has said, Fulham supporters turn left on the plane.   I remember going there some years ago and was placed next to home supporters who were wearing suits.   The club also experimented for a while with having a section for ‘neutral’ fans. The following analysis draws on the latest report from the Swiss Ramble.   The accounts are now a year old, but as the forensic analyst observes from his Zurich lair, the business model remains much the same. i.e, the amount the owner has to shell put would consume all my non-property assets in five days. Under Silva, Fulham have established themselves as a solid Premier League club, losing their tag as a “yo-yo” club. Before the arrival of the Portuguese coach, on the previous two occasions that they were promoted to the top flight they had failed to avoid an immediate ...