Skip to main content

Chelsea performed better under Abramovich

Chelsea's owners are rational actors so what is their strategy?

Under the ownership of free-spending oligarch Roman Abramovich Chelsea Football Club lost about £1mn a week for almost two decades. The losses racked up by the club’s current owners have made the Abramovich era appear restrained by comparison.

Chelsea this month reported a £262 mn pre-tax loss in 2024-25, a record for a Premier League club, as owners Clearlake Capital and financier Todd Boehly try to wean the club off Abramovich’s millions.

When US investment firm Clearlake and financier Boehly bought Chelsea for £2.5 bn almost three years ago, the football industry expected a new era of financial rigour at the west London club. But they have since spent about €1.7bn (£1.5bn) on players, parted ways with four head coaches and have yet to agree on a critical revenue driver: whether to modernise Chelsea’s existing stadium or move elsewhere. With the club at risk of missing out on a place in next season’s lucrative Champions League, football executives are questioning how Chelsea’s owners will make a return on their substantial investment.

Chelsea is the first team ever bought by Clearlake, which was better known for investing in the technology and consumer sectors. The Santa Monica-based firm owns more than 60 per cent of the club and its co-founder and managing partner, Behdad Eghbali, has emerged as a key decision maker.

Boehly, whose mentors include Guggenheim Partners chief Mark Walter and junk bond pioneer Michael Milken, has tasted success in sports. After backing Walter’s takeover of the Los Angeles Dodgers in 2012, the baseball team went on to win its first World Series title in 32 years. Their bet on Chelsea was predicated on the belief that elite European football clubs, which trade at a discount to US sports teams despite the sport’s greater global popularity, were undervalued.

Shortly after the deal, Clearlake co-founder José E Feliciano talked up the opportunity to grow Chelsea’s revenue to £1bn. Chelsea’s owners, who withheld £150mn of the purchase price to cover costs related to questionable actions taken under Abramovich, have put in place new private equity-style financing. At the centre of this is a $500mn payment-in-kind note provided by Ares Management to Chelsea’s holding company, 22 Holdco.

The club’s owners have spent €1.75 bn signing talented young players in the hope that they have greater resale value, which should enable them to eventually reduce their reliance on external financing. Chelsea have partly offset the spending splurge with €921mn of player sales.

While Abramovich’s reign was often chaotic, Chelsea won 17 major trophies, including five Premier League titles and two Champions League trophies, in that time. The only silverware of the Clearlake era so far is the Club World Cup and the European third-tier Uefa Conference League.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...