Skip to main content

Pink 'Un delivers verdict on Spurs

The Financial Times gives its verdict on the challenges facing Spurs:

'The next three days will be crucial for Tottenham Hotspur, one of English football’s “Big Six” clubs. Having won only once in the past eight games, the London team are in the drop zone, and the expectations among bookmakers and data wonks have now shifted: Spurs are increasingly expected to be relegated.

Demotion would be calamitous and unprecedented for such a wealthy club.

Some roots of the current crisis run shallow. A newly appointed manager failed to improve results after last year’s dismal league finish, the worst in decades. New players, bought at considerable cost, did not deliver what was hoped for on the pitch. And injuries to key squad members piled up. In an increasingly competitive league, such things can snowball quickly.

Without the experienced hand of Daniel Levy — Spurs executive chair for almost 25 years until his ousting in September — perhaps the club reacted to those problems too slowly. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

There’s certainly a case that the causes of today’s malaise date further back, possibly as long as a decade ago when Spurs were building their flashy new stadium. Such projects absorb huge amounts of time, energy and money — some fans say the football was not given the attention it deserved. The Spurs wage bill, a strong indicator of sporting results, has been much lower than at clubs of a similar size.

Divided ownership groups — Levy owns about 26 per cent of the club, with the rest held by the Lewis family — can also lead to drift, decay and poor decision making. It’s worth remembering that when Levy was pushed out, those close to the Lewis family said they were seeking more success on the pitch.

Even if Spurs avoid the drop, this season is surely a warning to owners (both current and aspiring) everywhere. The Premier League is a tough place, and even the biggest clubs can stumble towards the cliff edge. The sporting side must always be the top priority for those running the business, otherwise the most valuable asset — Premier League status — can be put at risk.

But sporting success is inherently expensive, and far from a sure thing. As we’ve seen again this week, nobody is really making any money out of operating a football club at the moment. So does investing in a football club, however big, still make sense? And are stadium upgrades, which undoubtedly boost revenue, too big a gamble?'

Let the Pink 'Un know what you think: scoreboard@ft.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do

Fulham cost the owner £1.4m a week

Things have changed a lot at Craven Cottage since Tommy Cooper was chairman.  Fulham are arguably London’s poshest club.  As their chief executive has said, Fulham supporters turn left on the plane.   I remember going there some years ago and was placed next to home supporters who were wearing suits.   The club also experimented for a while with having a section for ‘neutral’ fans. The following analysis draws on the latest report from the Swiss Ramble.   The accounts are now a year old, but as the forensic analyst observes from his Zurich lair, the business model remains much the same. i.e, the amount the owner has to shell put would consume all my non-property assets in five days. Under Silva, Fulham have established themselves as a solid Premier League club, losing their tag as a “yo-yo” club. Before the arrival of the Portuguese coach, on the previous two occasions that they were promoted to the top flight they had failed to avoid an immediate ...