Skip to main content

Change but no change at Chelsea

The buy out of the minority owners at Chelsea should enable the club to be run more smoothly.   Long-term challenges remain, notably whether to redevelop or replace Stamford Bridge to boost matchday revenue.

No agreement is expected imminently, but the sale would provide a form of resolution to long-standing tensions among Chelsea’s owners while also potentially easing the regulatory pressure that Walter is facing in the United States.

None of the principal parties are commenting, but it is very difficult to view this development as unrelated to Mark Walter’s unexpected sale of the LA Lakers to Josh Kushner and Bob Iger in a deal that valued the NBA franchise at $12.5billion (£9.2bn) last week. 

That news — just 14 months after Walter had bought a controlling interest in the Lakers from the Buss family at a then-record $10billion valuation — broke against the backdrop of an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice into the 66-year-old billionaire’s business dealings. 

Boehly was one of Walter’s partners in his brief Lakers venture, as well as in their hugely successful ownership of the Los Angeles Dodgers. From Boehly’s perspective, this could simply present a good opportunity to exit from Chelsea, an investment that has not panned out as he envisaged when he publicly fronted the BlueCo consortium that purchased the club from Roman Abramovich in June 2022. 

Despite maintaining a public profile with appearances at Stamford Bridge and on stage at various business conferences, Boehly has not enjoyed functional operational control over Chelsea since 2022, with decision-makers at majority shareholder Clearlake Capital directing the club’s strategy and the firm’s co-founder Behdad Eghbali actively involved in all major decisions. 

The £2.5billion takeover from Abramovich granted a majority shareholding to Eghbali and Jose E Feliciano’s Clearlake Capital, which, today, owns 61.85 per cent of the shares in 22 Holdco Limited, the UK-based holding company that oversees Chelsea and Ligue 1 side Strasbourg.

The remaining 38.15 per cent is held by Blueco 22 Holdings LP, a UK-registered limited partnership. Six partners make up that partnership: CFCB, LLC, controlled by Boehly; SME FC Holdings, LLC, controlled by Walter; Hansjorg Wyss as anIt has been made clear that the relationship between Clearlake and Boehly has remained a professional one despite any differences of opinion. However, when Boehly and Eghbali attend matches at Stamford Bridge, observers have noticed that they do not watch them together and stay in their own boxes in the West Stand.    individual, and two further entities affiliated with him; and Greenelite CFC, LLC, a Delaware-registered business whose controlling owner is unknown.

That 38.15 per cent is not split evenly, with only Boehly and Walter, along with Eghbali and Feliciano on the Clearlake side, listed as having a ‘significant interest’ in Chelsea under Premier League rules. It means each of Boehly and Walter beneficially owns at least 10 per cent of the club, while Wyss and whoever heads Greenelite split the rest.

On the assumption that Boehly and Walter own a third each of Blueco 22 Holdings LP, each would own a 12.7 per cent beneficial stake in Chelsea. In other words, a little over a quarter of the club might be about to change hands.

It has been made clear that the relationship between Clearlake and Boehly has remained a professional one despite any differences of opinion. However, when Boehly and Eghbali attend matches at Stamford Bridge, observers have noticed that they do not watch them together and stay in their own boxes in the West Stand. 

Not a great deal will change, to be honest at Chelse. While Boehly has held sign-off on all decisions, his input into how things are run has reduced dramatically over the years.  Boehly had a big influence on the first transfer window following the takeover in May 2022 when he was interim sporting director. But he has taken much more of a back seat since full-time sporting directors were put in place. 

On buying the club, clauses were put in place that shares could not be sold to those outside the consortium for 10 years. This means only Clearlake and Wyss can buy Boehly’s or Walter’s stake. Should Clearlake increase its share from 61.85 per cent, it will just further cement the fact that its decision-makers are the ones running the show.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do