Skip to main content

Coventry's roller coaster ride

For years, Coventry had lived a charmed life in the top flight, pulling off a few dramatic escapes either side of a glorious FA Cup success in 1987.  I knew someone who spent a season with the club writing a book in the anticipation of relegation: they stayed up. But by May 2001, making the short trip to Aston Villa for their penultimate game, they needed a minor miracle.  It didn’t happen, but fans hoped they would soon return.

Those next 25 years saw three relegations, one administration and, worst of all, two periods of exile from their own city, forced to play their home matches in Northampton and Birmingham due to a bitter rent dispute between Coventry City Council, which part-owned the stadium, and SISU Capital, the hedge fund that bought the club in 2007.


Sky Blues fans had more than their fair share of setbacks

For a time, Coventry became the ultimate illustration of English football’s need for governance reform: playing in front of meagre crowds 35 miles away in Northampton while their own stadium stood empty. A hardcore of fans travelled to support them not from the terraces but, by way of protest, from a hill overlooking Northampton’s Sixfields ground. They were bleak times.  SISU nearly destroyed the club, whatever their intentions.

And now, to a combination of joy and disbelief, they are back, under owner and Stratford upon Avon based Doug King and the leadership of former Chelsea and England midfielder Frank Lampard. Those years in the wilderness are behind them, but they will not be forgotten easily by the club’s supporters.

For many years their one remaining asset was the training ground at Ryton.  As I drove past it to my eldest’s home nearby it was a forlorn sight.  Now it is surrounded by high screens and there is often a knot of supporters at the gate hoping to spot players or even Lampard himself.

In 2005, five years behind schedule and four years after the jolt of relegation from the Premier League, Coventry moved from the rather dilapidated Highfield Road in inner city Coventry to a new home, initially called the Ricoh Arena.  It was part of an effort to boost North Coventry economically and socially.  As so often, the new stadium was portrayed as a symbol of a brighter future.   It staged some games in the 2012 Olympics.  It had room for trade shows, although my main memories are of covering election night counts until the early hours for BBC Coventry and Warwickshire.

The move was beset by problems from the start. Coventry had been in debt for years, compounded by relegation and the collapse of the English Football League’s (EFL) commercial deal with ITV Digital, and made only a small contribution to the construction of the new stadium. Instead, it was funded almost entirely by Coventry City Council and the Alan Edward Higgs Charity, which took ownership of the Ricoh Arena in a joint venture called Arena Coventry Limited (ACL).

Under the new arrangement, Coventry were tenants, paying roughly £100,000 a month in rent (about $180,000 in 2005), with no access to catering, parking or non-matchday income.

The arrival of SISU

Rather than move on to better things, Coventry drifted. The team stagnated, the surge in attendances didn’t happen and, by 2007, the club faced the threat of administration, at which point they were bought by SISU Capital, a London-based hedge fund.   I could never work out what their strategy was although the Coventry Evening Telegraph routinely rang me up to comment.

In April 2012, Coventry were relegated again, dropping down to the third tier for the first time since 1964. But even more damaging was a rent dispute. SISU began to withhold rent payments in the hope of forcing a renegotiation. ACL offered reduced terms, but a standoff ensued. Amid threats, counter-threats and court hearings, it was, inevitably, the club and its supporters who suffered.

Coventry entered administration, citing an inability to pay the outstanding £1.3million rent bill. The threat of homelessness loomed and, shortly before the following campaign began, the club announced it would play home games in Northampton for the next three seasons, a decision the EFL approved with “deep regret”.

Coventry’s average league attendance had fallen from 21,302 in their first season at the Ricoh to 10,950 in year eight as disillusionment — and anger with the owner — grew. Now it fell to just 2,348 as thousands of fans boycotted Northampton in protest. A small group of others watched from the hill, hoping the absurdity of the situation would draw attention to the club’s plight.

An uneasy truce saw Coventry return home — if it could still be considered home — the next season. But an opportunity to buy the Ricoh was missed. Instead, the stadium was sold to Wasps, a rugby union club with no previous link to the city.   My next door neighbour switched his allegiance to the egg chasers, but they eventually effectively went bust.

In 2019, with the Ricoh dispute unresolved, Coventry were forced to relocate again to Birmingham City’s stadium. The travelling distance was ‘only’ 18 miles — and at least they were in their home county, West Midlands, not back in Northamptonshire — but the city is not, as outsiders might imagine, a satellite of Birmingham.

Against the odds, Coventry won promotion back to the Championship in a season curtailed by the Covid-19 pandemic. In March 2021, the club agreed a 10 year rent deal to return to the Ricoh, which was renamed the Coventry Building Society Arena shortly afterwards.    One plan that had been floated was to build a smaller stadium on land owned by Warwick University on the city’s outskirts.   (There were some complexities in this episode which I know something about, but as a former employee of the university, I need to respect confidences).

The club was sold to King who had made a fortune in commodity trading and had a clear strategy for taking the club forward, even if the introduction of Lampard as manager was not initially popular.   The club bought the stadium in a £25m deal and secured promotion to the Premier League.

Coventry had a baptism of fire in the top flight away to champions Arsenal.  The 3-0 defeat was predictable but no disgrace.   Most pundits seem to think that all three promoted clubs will go down, although they admit that the Sky Blues have the best chance of staying up.   Much depends on Lampard who could be a target for other clubs in the managerial merry go round, but seems minded to stay.

Comments

  1. Intriguing article, thankyou

    But I am going to that issue with the claim that SISU nearly destroyed the club; they didn’t but I know that aligns with the prevalent narrative.

    Their strategy was clear at the start. They were the backers behind Ray Ranson’s intent to own a club and lay out his plan for success. The same grouping narrowly failed to buy Southampton previously.

    The past owners, Richardson and Robinson, before McGinity, had come to closest to destroying the club, in some people’s opinion. It’s forgotten now that they sold Highfield Road, failed to secure a new stadium, oversaw City’s first relegation in 5 decades and left CCFC in tens of millions in debt.

    Ranson and SISU picked up pieces with a new manager in Chris Coleman and some investment….Leon Best etc etc.

    But City never managed to emerge from the lower reaches of the Championship and unsurprisingly, whomever was funding through SISU lost patience. It was decided not to invest further and Ranson was removed.

    Because funding for players dried up, fans lost faith in the owners. But from a financial perspective, what SISU did made sense. They cut costs trying to make the club sustainable so they didn’t have to lose any more money.

    That leads to the dispute with ACL and the Council over the stadium with SISU clearly trying to undermine the ownership and get the ground on their terms.

    I would argue against you. There was never a chance to buy the stadium. The stadium was sold quietly to Wasps, leaving lots of people stunned and the first realisation that SISU maybe were not the only villains.

    Fast forward, with the club in better financial shape, Robins was appointed and promotions achieved - 2 of them and a cup win. Gyokeres was signed, so was Hamer and O’Hare and the club narrowly missed out on promotion back to the EPL losing on penalties in the play off final.

    SISU made lots of mistakes including running a poor PR campaign but they turned the club around completely.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for this informative clarification. It's a complex story and one that is difficult to get right. As it unfolded I had difficulty in providing any intelligent comment for the Evening Telgraph. Many Sky Blue fans I know were very critical of SISU, but the alternative narrative may never get a proper airing. What I found odd was the proposal to build a scaled down stadium at Warwick Uni given that I know the university was trying to build a relationship with the Liverpool Academy and did make some headway.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do