Skip to main content

Biggest loss in Dutch league for Feyenoord

During the past few days, we have been enjoying the world gymnastics championship well staged in an impressive arena in Rotterdam.  In this posting the focus is on the port city’s football club.

From his fastness in Zurich, the Swiss Ramble has been casting his usual forensic eye over the 2025/26 accounts from Feyenoord.  Here are his key findings.

Feyenoord had a “challenging” season off the pitch, as they swung from a €31.1m pre-tax profit to €17.0m loss, a sizeable year-on-year deterioration of €48.1m.  Revenue dropped by nearly a third, falling €51.5m from €166.7m to €115.2m, but costs remained at virtually the same level, so this all fed through to a much larger operating loss, which widened from €28.8m to €78.9m.

This was partially offset by €62.6m profit on player sales, up €2.2m from the previous year’s €60.3m.  The net loss after tax was lower at €12.6m, thanks to a €4.4m tax credit.

The main reason for the revenue decrease was significantly lower income from European competition, mainly prize money, but also a sizeable chunk of gate receipts. In total, this fell €55.1m (71%) from €77.8m to €22.7m.

Feyenoord’s revenue has consistently been lower than their main rivals Ajax and PSV, so the only time that they were ahead of both clubs in the last 10 years was back in 2017/18.  Last season the gap to Ajax was a chunky €73m, while they have never been so far behind PSV with the deficit up to €43m.

Feyenoord’s €17.0m is the largest pre-tax loss in the Eredivisie by some distance, based on the latest available accounts, as the next highest was Fortuna Sittard with just €4.1m.  To illustrate just how much of an outlier Feyenoord’s result was, no fewer than 11 of the 18 clubs in the Dutch top flight posted a profit, led by AZ €16.6m, Twente €9.4m and PSV Eindhoven €9.0m. Indeed, only three clubs lost more than €500k.

Dutch clubs basically look to offset large operating losses with profits from player sales. In this way, Feyenoord’s substantial €170m operating loss in the last four years was more than compensated by €210m profit from player trading.

Feyenoord’s broadcasting revenue significantly decreased by €46.9m (63%) from €73.9m to €27.0m, highlighting the difference between playing in the Champions League and the Europa League.

If anyone is in any doubt about why so many players make the move from the Eredivisie to England, just take a look at the relative size of the TV deals, where the Premier League’s €4.5 bln is an incredible 28 times as much as the Eredivisie.

Feyenoord’s average attendance was 47,500 in 2025/26, which was the second highest in the Eredivisie, only surpassed by Ajax 53,531.

Stadium

After these accounts, Feyenoord announced that the “long-cherished wish” of bringing together club and stadium had been approved, as the club acquired a 95% stake in Stadion Feijenoord, facilitated by issuing 80,635 new shares.  In recent years, the condition of De Kuip has deteriorated due to deferred maintenance and the financial challenges faced by Stadion Feijenoord.

However, the club has committed to invest has committed to invest €41.5m in much needed improvements, as it now clear that Feyenoord will continue to play there for the foreseeable future,   That said, the integration will give Feyenoord the opportunity to generate more revenue, particularly in corporate hospitality.

Feyenoord had been working on ambitious plans for a new stadium with a 63,000 capacity, but that project has been abandoned for the time being, due to soaring costs, exacerbated by higher interest rates.

Despite the significant reduction in revenue, Feyenoord’s wage bill only fell €1.1m (1%) from €84.2m to €83.1m.   wages have more than doubled in the last five years from just €37.3m in 2020/21. Before that it had been stuck in the €35-39m range over the previous five years.

Debt has grown by around €20m in the last three years, as it was only €8.5m in 2023.

There is no doubt that Feyenoord’s financial result last season was not great, as they posted a sizeable loss, despite generating a hefty €63m profit from player sales. This once again highlighted the importance of qualifying for the Champions League.

Revenue will be considerably higher this season after the return to the Champions League, though the net result will also be influenced by player sales, which are on the low side to date. It would therefore be no surprise if more business is done, either in the January window or before the end of June 2027.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Levy's anomalous status at Spurs

It is now nearly a year since Daniel Levy was dismissed as Tottenham Hotspur chairman by the Lewis family.  It has been 12 months of dramatic twists and turns, with Spurs avoiding relegation on the final day of the Premier League season, and then spending unprecedented sums this summer to try to make sure such a scare never happens again. But while most fans focus on the football — and a dubbing by Brentford   — another set of issues have been bubbling away separately. These relate to Levy’s continued position as a minority shareholder in the club. This has been in the news for much of this summer, even as we approach the first anniversary of Levy’s dismissal, and specifically this month, after he missed the opportunity last week to participate in the Lewis family’s latest equity injection into the club. On Thursday morning the club confirmed that his shareholding has been diluted, down by roughly two per cent, after the creation of new ENIC shares. Levy’s dism...