Skip to main content

Does audit regime at football clubs need tightening?

One of the missing pieces in the complex jigsaw that makes up the scrutiny and regulation of football finance is the role of auditors.  Indeed, the Financial Times devoted a whole page to the subject in its weekend edition.

Such has been the level of concern among chartered accountants that they have produced a training video relating to finances at a fictional dodgy football club using actors from Eastenders and Game of Thrones: https://www.icaew.com/about-icaew/news/2025-news-releases/football-finance-focus-of-new-icaew-film-to-help-train-accountants-may-2025

City were audited by BDO which is the fifth biggest accountancy firm in the UK and self-described as a market leader in football.  Industry insiders have suggested that BDO may need to contain 'brand damage' as a result of the City episode.  No one is suggesting that BDO have fallen below the highest standards of professional conduct and probity: the issue is bigger than any one firm.

BDO also audits Aston Villa, Burnley, QPR, Southampton, Celtic and Cardiff City.  The sums involved are relatively small in relation to total revenue but help it to establish a reputation as a sports auditor.

Its audit and tax work for City Football Group earned BDO around £200k a year, while City paid £830,000 in the nine years when misconduct was found to exist in terms of PL rules.

Football clubs are not classified as 'public interest entities' which would subject them to a much tougher oversight regime.  If City or any other club was classified as a public interest entity rather than a private one it would be subject to a tougher regulatory regime.   For example, these rules require rotation of key audit partners every five years.

As things stand, it is the ICAEW (the chartered accountants body) that takes responsibility for overseeing the quality of audits, but the FRC could take over the City case and is reportedly considering whether to do so.

Meanwhile, some of the Big Four accountancy firms are urging the Government to revisit the issue as it consults on its corporate reporting reform bill.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Levy's anomalous status at Spurs

It is now nearly a year since Daniel Levy was dismissed as Tottenham Hotspur chairman by the Lewis family.  It has been 12 months of dramatic twists and turns, with Spurs avoiding relegation on the final day of the Premier League season, and then spending unprecedented sums this summer to try to make sure such a scare never happens again. But while most fans focus on the football — and a dubbing by Brentford   — another set of issues have been bubbling away separately. These relate to Levy’s continued position as a minority shareholder in the club. This has been in the news for much of this summer, even as we approach the first anniversary of Levy’s dismissal, and specifically this month, after he missed the opportunity last week to participate in the Lewis family’s latest equity injection into the club. On Thursday morning the club confirmed that his shareholding has been diluted, down by roughly two per cent, after the creation of new ENIC shares. Levy’s dism...