Skip to main content

New bonanza for sports lawyers as Real threaten to sue PL clubs

Real Madrid want the six Premier League clubs that signed up to the European Super League (ESL) to pay a share of the initial costs of the abandoned project.

Multiple sources with a close understanding of the situation told The New York Times that the Spanish club believe Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur should still be liable for the setup costs of the plan, despite subsequently pulling out.

One source said these costs could be as high as €80 million (£67.3m; $89.9m) in total. Madrid, alongside domestic rivals Barcelona and Juventus of Italy, have so far shared promotional costs associated with the ESL, plans for which were announced in April 2021.

Of the 12 founding ESL members, nine — each of the six English clubs, along with Spanish side Atletico Madrid and both Milan and Inter of Serie A — pulled out swiftly in the days following its launch. Another, Juventus, said in 2023 that they had withdrawn from the proposal, before Barcelona did earlier this year

The clubs had, however, signed up to a shareholders’ agreement for the European Super League Company, a holding company based in Spain.

Whether the six Premier League clubs are bound to pay a share of the ESL costs is likely to be determined by the interpretation of the contract’s wording around clubs signing up to “jointly own and manage” the project, and whether that wording encompasses financial obligations.

The legal status of the ESL has been a simmering dispute between its 12 founding clubs ever since nine of them quit the project within days of its launch in April 2021.  For those who left, it was an embarrassing episode but they said sorry and now want to pretend it never happened. But for those who stayed, particularly Real Madrid, who stayed the longest, the ESL is like The Eagles’ Hotel California: you can check out any time you like but you can never leave.

A good lawyer could argue that clause is an open-ended commitment to cough up. But another good lawyer could point out there is no mention of money and the ESL was clearly dead on arrival.

So, if Madrid really want those contributions, they are probably going to have to sue for them. Which is great news for sports lawyers.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Levy's anomalous status at Spurs

It is now nearly a year since Daniel Levy was dismissed as Tottenham Hotspur chairman by the Lewis family.  It has been 12 months of dramatic twists and turns, with Spurs avoiding relegation on the final day of the Premier League season, and then spending unprecedented sums this summer to try to make sure such a scare never happens again. But while most fans focus on the football — and a dubbing by Brentford   — another set of issues have been bubbling away separately. These relate to Levy’s continued position as a minority shareholder in the club. This has been in the news for much of this summer, even as we approach the first anniversary of Levy’s dismissal, and specifically this month, after he missed the opportunity last week to participate in the Lewis family’s latest equity injection into the club. On Thursday morning the club confirmed that his shareholding has been diluted, down by roughly two per cent, after the creation of new ENIC shares. Levy’s dism...