Skip to main content

Villa's stadium ambitions

Aston Villa today celebrated a 2-1 win over Manchester City despite playing in a three sided ground.

The North Stand, behind one of the goals and opposite the famous Holte End, is closed for the 2026-27 season as part of Villa Park’s redevelopment.  Once functional, it should house more than 12,000 spectators. Incremental additions to the ground’s three other sides will lead to the targeted capacity and, longer-term, to a 52,500-seat venue.

Having secured Champions League qualification at the end of 2023-24, the football department were keen to avoid playing home matches in a three-stand stadium. There was a desire for Villa Park to remain atmospheric and intimidating for opponents, as well as not be an eyesore.

Club sources estimate shutting the stand this season costs about £6million. Villa decided it was better to bite the bullet and get the work done in one season rather than two, as the estimated increased income from the revamped stand exceeds the agreed fixed interest rates.

The North Stand build is being funded by a combined £150m in ‘private placement’ loans, each held by NSWE Jersey Holdings Limited (NSWEJH). To raise the types of bonds Villa have, a company has to be publicly traded. The club therefore set up NSWEJH, a publicly listed company in Jersey, to hold the debt.

Those bonds comprise two facilities. The first is a £60m loan over 22 years at 7.55 per cent annual interest, with no interest payments for the first two years. That will be fully repaid in 2048. The second is a £90million loan over six years at 6.56 per cent annual interest, repayable via a one-off ‘bullet’ payment at the end of June 2032. On both loans, the interest rate is fixed and so not susceptible to market changes.

Villa have, in effect, split the company, so the stadium debt is separate and should, in theory, be repaid by the increased income from the revamped stadium. Expectations for increased revenues from the rebuilt North Stand exceed the costs of servicing the loans.

The private placement has allowed Villa to take out debt with institutional lenders. Goldman Sachs, the American multinational investment bank, organised the funding. The cost of the build is £110m, with the extra £40m of debt both covering the two-year payment holiday on the £60m bond (interest will still accrue) and ensuring Villa have extra liquidity if anything were to go wrong.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Levy's anomalous status at Spurs

It is now nearly a year since Daniel Levy was dismissed as Tottenham Hotspur chairman by the Lewis family.  It has been 12 months of dramatic twists and turns, with Spurs avoiding relegation on the final day of the Premier League season, and then spending unprecedented sums this summer to try to make sure such a scare never happens again. But while most fans focus on the football — and a dubbing by Brentford   — another set of issues have been bubbling away separately. These relate to Levy’s continued position as a minority shareholder in the club. This has been in the news for much of this summer, even as we approach the first anniversary of Levy’s dismissal, and specifically this month, after he missed the opportunity last week to participate in the Lewis family’s latest equity injection into the club. On Thursday morning the club confirmed that his shareholding has been diluted, down by roughly two per cent, after the creation of new ENIC shares. Levy’s dism...