Skip to main content

The tangled tale of the Saudis and Newcastle United

The proposed £300m Saudi-led takeover of English football club has become highly political.   The Daily Mail revealed a message sent by Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson following the collapse of the deal last year. It reads: “We expect the English Premier League to reconsider and correct its wrong conclusion.” 

In April 2020, Newcastle owner Mike Ashley agreed to sell the club to an investment consortium including Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia (PIF), the British financier Amanda Staveley and the billionaire Reuben brothers.

The Newcastle Chronicle this week published a series of emails between the UK government and the Premier League showing how British officials constantly sought information for months on exactly when the sale — seen as crucial to Anglo-Saudi relations — would be completed.

Instead, the transaction got stuck in the approval process for club takeovers.   As the Premier League’s chief executive Richard Masters has  stated, its board decided PIF was controlled by the Saudi government. (Bin Salman, the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, is also chair of PIF.)

That determination meant the Saudi officials would have needed to provide information on whether its leadership passed the league’s “Owners’ and Directors’ Test”. That includes a stipulation that potential owners can be barred if they have committed an act in a foreign jurisdiction that would be considered a criminal offence in the UK, even if not illegal in their home territory. 

While human rights activists point to the Saudi state’s role in the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi as a potential disqualifying factor, another issue is the World Trade Organization’s ruling that the country was behind beoutQ, an Arabic language pirate network which had been illegally streaming Premier League football matches across the Middle East.

The consortium did not accept the Premier League’s position that it is ultimately controlled by the Saudi government, and refused to engage in an independent arbitration that would determine the issue. And so the Saudis pulled put. 

A Saudi official declined to comment on whether Prince Mohammed directly contacted Johnson in regards to the Newcastle deal, but said: “There were appropriate diplomatic conversations and reassurances that there would not be government involvement in the deal, or the running of the club and it would be run by the consortium.” The UK government and Premier League declined to comment. 

All of this still matters because the Premier League and Newcastle are currently holding arbitration hearings regarding the failed takeover, with the club hoping the deal can be resurrected. 

But a key issue remains whether PIF can be separated from the Saudi state. Bin Salman’s alleged lobbying of Johnson will be a relevant consideration in that process.  It will undoubtedly take some time to sort out.

 

Comments

  1. I Smell bogus reporting ; the premier league did not make a final decision the Saudis pulled from the deal. So why would the crown Prince ask for a decision to be reversed; secondly it’s easy to say someone refused to comment; without even asking someone

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/