The tangled tale of the Saudis and Newcastle United

The proposed £300m Saudi-led takeover of English football club has become highly political. The Daily Mail revealed a message sent by Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson following the collapse of the deal last year. It reads: “We expect the English Premier League to reconsider and correct its wrong conclusion.”

In April 2020, Newcastle owner Mike Ashley agreed to sell the club to an investment consortium including Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia (PIF), the British financier Amanda Staveley and the billionaire Reuben brothers.

The Newcastle Chronicle this week published a series of emails between the UK government and the Premier League showing how British officials constantly sought information for months on exactly when the sale — seen as crucial to Anglo-Saudi relations — would be completed.

Instead, the transaction got stuck in the approval process for club takeovers. As the Premier League’s chief executive Richard Masters has stated, its board decided PIF was controlled by the Saudi government. (Bin Salman, the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, is also chair of PIF.)

That determination meant the Saudi officials would have needed to provide information on whether its leadership passed the league’s “Owners’ and Directors’ Test”. That includes a stipulation that potential owners can be barred if they have committed an act in a foreign jurisdiction that would be considered a criminal offence in the UK, even if not illegal in their home territory.

While human rights activists point to the Saudi state’s role in the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi as a potential disqualifying factor, another issue is the World Trade Organization’s ruling that the country was behind beoutQ, an Arabic language pirate network which had been illegally streaming Premier League football matches across the Middle East.

The consortium did not accept the Premier League’s position that it is ultimately controlled by the Saudi government, and refused to engage in an independent arbitration that would determine the issue. And so the Saudis pulled put.

A Saudi official declined to comment on whether Prince Mohammed directly contacted Johnson in regards to the Newcastle deal, but said: “There were appropriate diplomatic conversations and reassurances that there would not be government involvement in the deal, or the running of the club and it would be run by the consortium.” The UK government and Premier League declined to comment.

All of this still matters because the Premier League and Newcastle are currently holding arbitration hearings regarding the failed takeover, with the club hoping the deal can be resurrected.

But a key issue remains whether PIF can be separated from the Saudi state. Bin Salman’s alleged lobbying of Johnson will be a relevant consideration in that process. It will undoubtedly take some time to sort out.

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful. Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy). However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch. Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog