The tangled tale of the Saudis and Newcastle United

The proposed £300m Saudi-led takeover of English football club has become highly political. The Daily Mail revealed a message sent by Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson following the collapse of the deal last year. It reads: “We expect the English Premier League to reconsider and correct its wrong conclusion.”

In April 2020, Newcastle owner Mike Ashley agreed to sell the club to an investment consortium including Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia (PIF), the British financier Amanda Staveley and the billionaire Reuben brothers.

The Newcastle Chronicle this week published a series of emails between the UK government and the Premier League showing how British officials constantly sought information for months on exactly when the sale — seen as crucial to Anglo-Saudi relations — would be completed.

Instead, the transaction got stuck in the approval process for club takeovers. As the Premier League’s chief executive Richard Masters has stated, its board decided PIF was controlled by the Saudi government. (Bin Salman, the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, is also chair of PIF.)

That determination meant the Saudi officials would have needed to provide information on whether its leadership passed the league’s “Owners’ and Directors’ Test”. That includes a stipulation that potential owners can be barred if they have committed an act in a foreign jurisdiction that would be considered a criminal offence in the UK, even if not illegal in their home territory.

While human rights activists point to the Saudi state’s role in the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi as a potential disqualifying factor, another issue is the World Trade Organization’s ruling that the country was behind beoutQ, an Arabic language pirate network which had been illegally streaming Premier League football matches across the Middle East.

The consortium did not accept the Premier League’s position that it is ultimately controlled by the Saudi government, and refused to engage in an independent arbitration that would determine the issue. And so the Saudis pulled put.

A Saudi official declined to comment on whether Prince Mohammed directly contacted Johnson in regards to the Newcastle deal, but said: “There were appropriate diplomatic conversations and reassurances that there would not be government involvement in the deal, or the running of the club and it would be run by the consortium.” The UK government and Premier League declined to comment.

All of this still matters because the Premier League and Newcastle are currently holding arbitration hearings regarding the failed takeover, with the club hoping the deal can be resurrected.

But a key issue remains whether PIF can be separated from the Saudi state. Bin Salman’s alleged lobbying of Johnson will be a relevant consideration in that process. It will undoubtedly take some time to sort out.

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion. Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs. An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Spurs CEO attacks luxury training base

The Tottenham Hotspur chief executive Vinai Venkatesham has issued a withering assessment of the way the club was run under Daniel Levy, likening the state-of-the-art training centre to a five-star hotel rather than a centre of high performance. Venkatesham was appointed to his role in April 2025, having stepped down as chief executive at Arsenal the previous summer. However, he has said that some aspects of the club were “in a significantly worse state” than he expected. “Our training centre is amazing, one of the best, if not the best in the world,” Venkatesham told BBC Sport. “But when you look around, it looks more like a five-star hotel than it does a performance environment. That will change over the summer. I think there are many areas where the club hasn’t got the right level of expertise.” He explained that the football side of operations was the club’s main downfall when he arrived last year. [One Spurs fan wryly observed that it was like a water company sayi...

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog