Skip to main content

Spygate leads to severe punishment for Southampton

Southampton have been kicked out of the Championship play-off final, known as the richest game in football due to the financial rewards from winning it, after the club was found to have broken league rules by spying on opponents’ training sessions. 

The English Football League, which runs the second, third and fourth tiers of professional men’s football, said on Tuesday that an independent disciplinary commission had decided to expel Southampton from the play-off final, due to take place on Saturday.

It added Southampton had “admitted to multiple breaches of EFL Regulations related to the unauthorised filming of other clubs’ training”. Southampton will also receive a four-point deduction for next season.

Southampton had been hoping to bounce back to the Premier League after being relegated last year. The south coast club is majority owned by its chair, Serbian billionaire Dragan Šolak. The club still has tickets for the Championship play-off final advertised for sale on its website.  

Middlesbrough, one of the clubs that the EFL said Southampton had admitted to spying on by instructing a staff member to film their team in training, will now face Hull in the play-off final at Wembley on Saturday if it goes ahead. Middlesbrough lost in the play-off semi-final against Southampton a week ago, but the result was quickly overshadowed by allegations of spying.

The winner of Saturday’s match is guaranteed at least £200mn in additional revenue — a combination of a single year’s Premier League television money plus up to three years of so-called parachute payments if the club is immediately relegated back down to the second tier. That revenue exceeds the rewards available from winning a single football game anywhere else in the world.

The EFL said Southampton had initially been charged on May 8 with breaching league rules ahead of a fixture against Oxford in December and again in April before a match against Ipswich. Those charges were then updated on May 17 after the two-leg semi-final against Middlesbrough.

 The EFL rules prohibit clubs from observing rivals’ training sessions within 72 hours of a scheduled match.  The EFL said Southampton had the right to appeal and that all parties were “working to try and resolve any appeal” on Wednesday. “Subject to the outcome, it could result in a further change to Saturday’s fixture,” it added.

Middlesbrough said it welcomed the EFL decision and would issue ticket information for the play-off final shortly. “We believe this sends out a clear message for the future of our game regarding sporting integrity and conduct,” the club added. Spying cases are rare but not unheard of in English football. In 2019, Leeds United were fined £200,000 for watching opponents’ training sessions before games.

I think that Southampton’s appeal is unlikely to succeed. With all respect to Oxford United, I am surprised that one could learn anything useful by spying on their training sessions.  It may be that their training ground is open to such activity rather like Middlesbrough.  Coventry City have screened their training ground at Ryton.

It is possible that Southampton could take the matter to the public courts, questioning the EFL’s authority or its decision-making.   As things stand, the real losers are Hull City who are going to face different opponents.   Their fans cannot make travel arrangements and hotel bookings with any certainty.

Many Saints fans are upset at their club’s conduct, but the sums of money at stake in the modern game encourage (but do not justify) various forms of cheating.  The real losers here are football fans rather than whoever was involved in the decision making at St. Mary’s.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...